top of page

Core Principles
Enough4Today

Mission

Our mission is to support individuals and groups in building and sustaining growth, fostering relationships.

Vision

Our vision is to co-create an experience where any and all clients can bravely and compassionately explore their story, work towards enhanced discernment, and ultimately, increase their capacity for a well-lived life.

Value

Our values are rooted in Relational Cultural Theory (RCT). We agree with RCT theorists that “people grow through and toward relationships throughout the lifespan” (Jordan, 2018,

p. 4).  These values are the foundation of the E4T LLC mission and the tools we use to actualize our vision. Learn more about relational-cultural theory (RCT).  

Mutuality - Relationships with ALL clients are framed by mutual respect and mutual openness to change, which means development isn’t a one way street (Jordan, 2018). Both the client and practitioner can and must grow within the working relationship.  

 

Consciousness - Relationships happen within context, which significantly impacts patterns of connection and disconnection.  Explicitly naming contextual factors that shape(d) clients’ understanding of how to move in relationships fosters empathy for self and others. 

​

Bravery - Growthful relationships require the belief that one can tolerate the vulnerability, uncertainty, and complexity of authentic relationships.  It’s not about being nice, it’s about being truthful with love. 

 

Connection - Living well requires intentional connection with others.  Actively fighting against disconnection within ourselves and within our spheres of influence buffers us from shame, disempowerment, and marginalization.

 

Possibility - Reminding ourselves of the possibility of something different reduces external control, which often drives internal doubt(s).  Questioning limitations can feel scary, but we must relinquish fear in order to experience liberation.

 


Jordan, J. V. (2018). Introduction. In J. V. Jordan, Relational–cultural therapy (2nd ed., pp. 3–10). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000063-001

bottom of page